Lisp is the world\u2019s greatest programming language\u2014or so its proponents think. The structure of Lisp makes it easy to extend the language or even to implement entirely new dialects without starting from scratch. Overall, the evolution of Lisp has been guided more by institutional rivalry, one-upsmanship, and the glee born of technical cleverness that is characteristic of the \u201chacker culture\u201d than by sober assessments of technical requirements. Nevertheless this process has eventually produced both an industrialstrength programming language, messy but powerful, and a technically pure dialect, small but powerful, that is suitable for use by programming-language theoreticians.<\/p>\n
We pick up where McCarthy<\/a>\u2019s paper in the first HOPL<\/a> conference left off. We trace the development chronologically from the era of the PDP-6<\/a>, through the heyday of Interlisp and MacLisp, past the ascension and decline of special purpose Lisp machines, to the present era of standardization activities. We then examine the technical evolution of a few representative language features, including both some notable successes and some notable failures, that illuminate design issues that distinguish Lisp from other programming languages. We also discuss the use of Lisp<\/a> as a laboratory for designing other programming languages<\/a>. We conclude with some reflections on the forces that have driven the evolution of Lisp.<\/p>\n \n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"