{"id":6374,"date":"2022-05-27T03:46:29","date_gmt":"2022-05-27T03:46:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.booksofall.com\/?post_type=product&p=6374"},"modified":"2022-06-15T03:26:30","modified_gmt":"2022-06-15T03:26:30","slug":"unified-modeling-language-uml-with-visual-paradigm","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/www.booksofall.com\/fr\/unified-modeling-language-uml-with-visual-paradigm\/","title":{"rendered":"Unified Modeling Language (UML) with Visual Paradigm"},"content":{"rendered":"

The\u00a0Unified Modeling Language<\/b>\u00a0(UML<\/b>) is a general-purpose, developmental,\u00a0modeling language<\/a>\u00a0in the field of\u00a0software engineering<\/a> that is intended to provide a standard way to visualize the design of a system.<\/sup><\/p>\n

The creation of UML was originally motivated by the desire to standardize the disparate notational systems and approaches to software design. It was developed at\u00a0Rational Software<\/a>\u00a0in 1994\u20131995, with further development led by them through 1996.<\/sup><\/p>\n

In 1997, UML was adopted as a standard by the\u00a0Object Management Group<\/a>\u00a0(OMG), and has been managed by this organization ever since. In 2005, UML was also published by the\u00a0International Organization for Standardization<\/a> (ISO) as an approved ISO standard.\u00a0<\/sup>Since then the standard has been periodically revised to cover the latest revision of UML.<\/sup>\u00a0In software engineering, most practitioners do not use UML, but instead produce informal hand drawn diagrams; these diagrams, however, often include elements from UML.<\/p>\n

UML 1.x<\/span><\/h3>\n

Under the technical leadership of those three (Rumbaugh, Jacobson and Booch), a consortium called the\u00a0UML Partners<\/a>\u00a0was organized in 1996 to complete the\u00a0Unified Modeling Language (UML)<\/i>\u00a0specification, and propose it to the Object Management Group (OMG) for standardization. The partnership also contained additional interested parties (for example\u00a0HP<\/a>,\u00a0DEC<\/a>,\u00a0IBM<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0Microsoft<\/a>). The UML Partners\u2019 UML 1.0 draft was proposed to the OMG in January 1997 by the consortium. During the same month the UML Partners formed a group, designed to define the exact meaning of language constructs, chaired by\u00a0Cris Kobryn<\/a>\u00a0and administered by Ed Eykholt, to finalize the specification and integrate it with other standardization efforts. The result of this work, UML 1.1, was submitted to the OMG in August 1997 and adopted by the OMG in November 1997.<\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n

After the first release a task force was formed<\/sup>\u00a0to improve the language, which released several minor revisions, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5.<\/sup><\/p>\n

The standards it produced (as well as the original standard) have been noted as being ambiguous and inconsistent.<\/sup><\/sup><\/p>\n

Cardinality notation<\/span><\/h4>\n

As with database Chen, Bachman, and ISO\u00a0ER diagrams<\/a>, class models are specified to use \u201clook-across\u201d\u00a0cardinalities<\/a>, even though several authors (Merise<\/a>,\u00a0<\/sup>Elmasri & Navathe<\/sup>\u00a0amongst others\u00a0<\/sup>) prefer same-side or \u201clook-here\u201d for roles and both minimum and maximum cardinalities. Recent researchers (Feinerer,\u00a0<\/sup>Dullea et al.<\/sup>) have shown that the \u201clook-across\u201d technique used by UML and ER diagrams is less effective and less coherent when applied to\u00a0n<\/i>-ary relationships of order strictly greater than 2.<\/p>\n

Feinerer says: \u201cProblems arise if we operate under the look-across semantics as used for UML associations. Hartmann. investigates this situation and shows how and why different transformations fail.\u201d, and: \u201cAs we will see on the next few pages, the look-across interpretation introduces several difficulties which prevent the extension of simple mechanisms from binary to\u00a0n<\/i>-ary associations.\u201d<\/p>\n

UML 2<\/span><\/h3>\n

UML 2.0 major revision replaced version 1.5 in 2005, which was developed with an enlarged consortium to improve the language further to reflect new experience on usage of its features.<\/sup><\/p>\n

Although UML 2.1 was never released as a formal specification, versions 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 appeared in 2007, followed by UML 2.2 in February 2009. UML 2.3 was formally released in May 2010.<\/sup>\u00a0UML 2.4.1 was formally released in August 2011.\u00a0<\/sup>UML 2.5 was released in October 2012 as an \u201cIn progress\u201d version and was officially released in June 2015.\u00a0<\/sup>Formal version 2.5.1 was adopted in December 2017.<\/sup><\/p>\n

There are four parts to the UML 2.x specification:<\/p>\n