{"id":3469,"date":"2022-04-25T09:02:27","date_gmt":"2022-04-25T09:02:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.booksofall.com\/de\/?post_type=product&p=3469"},"modified":"2022-05-17T05:41:07","modified_gmt":"2022-05-17T05:41:07","slug":"moment-of-truth","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/www.booksofall.com\/de\/moment-of-truth\/","title":{"rendered":"Moment of Truth"},"content":{"rendered":"

Immediate action worldwide to halt deforestation<\/a> and restore extensive areas of natural forest is key to limiting climate change<\/a> and biodiversity<\/a> loss. Halting and beginning to reverse the destruction of the world\u2019s forests for agriculture is the cheapest, quickest and most equitable option to stabilise the climate and buy time for a just transition to a low-carbon economy.<\/p>\n

However, although there is widespread agreement on the need for rapid and far-reaching action, political and corporate commitments are failing to translate into measurable results on the ground. Agricultural commodities such as palm oil continue to drive deforestation and emissions \u2013 and push endangered species like orangutans and tigers ever closer to extinction. Time is running out. Global brands must not walk away from the agreed milestone \u2013 an end to the link between deforestation and globally traded commodities by no later than 2020.<\/p>\n

In 2010, members of the Consumer Goods Forum (CGF)<\/a> pledged to do their bit to protect forests and limit climate change, with a clear commitment to clean up global commodity supply chains by 2020. World governments, emboldened by this pledge and in the knowledge that stopping deforestation was the easiest and most cost-effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, incorporated action to address forest destruction into the Paris Agreement on climate change as a key part of their strategy to mitigate global temperature rise. 2020 targets for halting deforestation and biodiversity loss and for restoring degraded forests also figure in the United Nations (UN)<\/a> Sustainable Development Goals, to be implemented by \u2018all countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership\u2019 in order to eliminate poverty and \u2018to heal and secure our planet\u2019.<\/p>\n

Yet with less than two years to go until 2020, deforestation to produce commodities such as palm oil shows no sign of slowing down. Corporate commitments and policies have proliferated, but companies have largely failed to implement them. As a result, consumer brands, including those with \u2018no deforestation, no peat, no exploitation\u2019 (NDPE)<\/a> policies, still use palm oil from producers that destroy rainforests, drain carbon-rich peatland and violate the human rights of workers and local communities \u2013 making their customers complicit in forest destruction, climate change and human rights abuses.<\/p>\n

At the start of 2018, Greenpeace International challenged 16 leading members of the CGF to demonstrate their progress towards a clean palm oil supply chain.<\/strong><\/p>\n

We called on them to disclose publicly the mills that produced their palm oil, and the names of the producer groups that controlled those mills. If disclosed, this information would show whether brands had forest destroyers in their supply chains. Eight CGF brands \u2013 Colgate-Palmolive, General Mills, Mars, Mondel\u0113z, Nestl\u00e9, Procter & Gamble (P&G), Reckitt Benckiser and Unilever \u2013 were prepared to hold themselves accountable prior to publication of this report. The others \u2013 Ferrero, Hershey, Kellogg\u2019s, Kraft Heinz, Johnson & Johnson, PepsiCo, PZ Cussons and Smucker\u2019s \u2013 refused to reveal who produced their palm oil, thereby concealing the extent of their complicity in rainforest destruction.<\/p>\n

Brands have failed to clean up their supply chains \u2013 and the people and environment of palm oil-producing countries are suffering the consequences.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Decades of deforestation for plantations has created the ideal conditions for the raging forest and peatland fires \u2013 often deliberately set by companies clearing the land \u2013 that regularly threaten the health of people across Southeast Asia and imperil our global climate. Exploitation of workers, including the use of child labour, remains endemic in the sector. Meanwhile, Indonesia, at the heart of the industry\u2019s expansion, has more threatened and endangered species than any other country on the planet, in many cases as a result of loss of habitat; leading conservationists now talk about when, not if, orangutans and other iconic species will become extinct.<\/p>\n

Palm oil is a high-risk commodity. Palm oil traders (typically corporations that also have plantation interests) continue to allow oil from rainforest destroyers into their mills, refineries and distribution systems, and neither governments nor the main industry body \u2013 the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) \u2013 can currently be relied on to prevent producers from engaging in deforestation or clearing peatland. Accordingly, brands must adopt NDPE policies if they have not already done so, and take responsibility themselves for ensuring that the producer groups in their palm oil supply chains comply with those policies as soon as possible, and no later than 2020. Equivalent policies should be enforced across all their commodities.<\/p>\n

The first step towards achieving this is for each brand to publish a clear, time-bound plan, including an explicit commitment that by 2020, 100% of the palm oil it uses will come from producers whose entire operations have been verified as compliant with its NDPE policy \u2013 even if that means using less palm oil than it is using today.<\/p>\n

Next, brands should open themselves up to public scrutiny by publishing complete lists of the mills and producer groups in their supply chains. Then they must take responsibility for investigating these producer groups to identify any that are clearing rainforests or peatlands, or exploiting workers or local communities. Brands must work with traders to get concession maps, and other data necessary to enable successful monitoring, in the public domain. Ultimately, brands and traders must exclude any producer that refuses to reform, even if the palm oil it is supplying to them comes from different concessions to those it is clearing.<\/p>\n

By 2020, a responsible brand should be able to demonstrate that all the palm oil it uses comes from reputable producer groups whose operations have been verified compliant with its NDPE policy. At the same time, brands should support the transformation of the entire industry by sourcing only from traders and other suppliers that can show that all the palm oil they sell comes from producers that have been verified as compliant with NDPE standards.<\/p>\n

Source: Greenpeace (http:\/\/www.greenpeace.org<\/a>)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"